The Skylark of Space

1 comment. Post a comment.

DCollison
DCollison
on Dec 26, 2009 at 20:34

3 out of 5.

The science on this one is so badly outdated (written in 1928) that it borders more on fantasy than science fiction. I found the "bad guys" to be too simplistic and one dimensional. Interesting as a 'curiosity read' but not for a deep read.